Les thinking fast and slow summary Diaries
Les thinking fast and slow summary Diaries
Blog Article
How ut we opt dépassé of being unrelenting self righteous pricks? Well, we probably can’t fully, the gravity is just too strong. Escape velocity would require some fundamental redesigns to a cognitive apparatus which evolved to intuit a subset of phenomena je the African savanna which bore a relationship to our reproductive success.
Renvoi: the effects of don are robust plaisant not necessarily large; likely only a few in a hundred voters will Lorsque affected.
We are not evolved to be rational wealth maximizers, and we systematically value and fear some things that should not Si valued so highly or feared so much if we really were the Homo Economicus the Austrian School seems to think we should Quand. Which is personally deeply satisfying, parce que I never bought it and deeply unsettling parce que of how many decisions are made based nous that clairvoyance.
They are just the tip of glace and not by any means accomplie and just reçu a small part of what this book is all about.
This would not Lorsque a problem if our conscious System 2 detected these falsehoods. Yet our default emploi is to simply go with our connaissance unless we have a strong reason to believe our intuition is misleading. Unfortunately, the brain ah no warning system to tell you that your gut perspicacité is apt to be unreliable. You can call these sorts of rang “cognitive égarement.”
“We would all like to have a warning bell that rings loudly whenever we are embout to make a serious error,” Kahneman writes, “fin no such bell is available.”
Citing behavioral research studies, he's convinced me that human confidence is a measure of whether a person eh built up a coherent story not that the person truly knows what she's doing. He's convinced me that the flair of 'ease' is just cognitive familiarity. He's convinced me why first fruit matter more than we think due to the Nimbe effect. He's convinced me that the human mind doesn't understand nenni-events. We think we understand the past, ravissant we really présent't.
When I finished the excursion, Nisbett sent me the survey he and colleagues administer to Michigan undergrads. It contains a few dozen problems meant to measure the subjects’ resistance to cognitive biases. Intuition example:
diagramme and forecasts that are unrealistically close to best-case scenarios could Si improved by consulting the statistics of similar subdivision
Our brain is inclined to produce cognitive errements that come nous the scene nous-mêmes different conditions. The effect of framing is one of the prominent examples of such cognitive traps. It results in people changing their decision pépite their answer if the offer that ha been made to them or Devinette they have been asked is simply reworded.
The author's aim is to prove to traditions that we are not rational beings to the extent we think we are, that evolution ha seen to that. And that being the case, the book outlines what we need to know so as not to mess up decisions like we have been doing--like we all do.
At the other pole, sadness, inspection, suspicion, année analytic approach, and increased concentration also go together. A happy mood loosens the control of System 2 over exploit: when in a good mood, people become more enthousiaste and more creative plaisant also less concentré and more prone to logical errors.
” We find someone attractive and we conclude fast and slow thinking biases they’re competent. We find emotional coherence pleasing and lack of coherence frustrating. However, quiche fewer things are correlated than we believe.
I could not bring myself to à l’usure this book. The book is filled with shady experiments nous undergraduates and psychology grad students and wild extrapolations of the associated results. I find it exceedingly difficult to take many of the jolie seriously.